Solar Eclipse 2026-08-12 in Aragón, Spain

Preparations for this eclipse started already in 2019, when I first visited the villages of Cetina and Sisamon. The villages are just a few kilometers apart and are located between Madrid and Zaragoza. Especially the vicinity of Sisamon profed to have great spots for night time observations, as light pollution is pretty low. The same spot I observed in 2019 was also a perfect spot for the solar eclipse, as it lies approximately 1000m above sea level in a high plane. To the west, only some distant hills are seen, reaching 2 degrees above the horizon at maximum. This was crucial, as the totality would happen with the sun being only 7 degrees above the horizon.

Thanks to the mayor of Sisamon and my sister in law to communicate with him, I got the permission to setup my observation base at this very location. He also supported me in having my complete equipment without any obstacles and disturbances, despite a good 100 locals joining the event. They were all essential for the emotional experience, as many of them started cheering and shouting when totality arrived.
A big THANK YOU to everyone involved to make this a perfect day!

According equipment, my primary goal was to get the shots for the Eclipse Mega Movie project (a Sonoma State / NASA project, I participated the third time). Then, some overview and especially landscape views of totality were on my plan, to also showcase the shadow of the moon.

What does the sun look like on camera

In Spain at the eclipse site I got a couple of times the question, how the sun will look like visually and on their own camera. The majority was referring to their mobile phone when thinking about a camera. So in general, my reply was rather disappointig to them. You know why? It is easy to explain:

The size the sun as seen from earth, is half a degree in diameter. (Luckily, the moon is exactly the same size with minor variations, so we can witness solar eclipses 🙂 )

Mobile phone cameras have typical angles of view in the range of:

  • 120 degrees in ultra wide angle camera (12 mm lens on full frame camera)
  • 80 degrees on the main camera (wide angle) (24 mm lens on full frame camera)
  • 10-20 degrees with tele camera (120-240 mm lens on full frame camera) 

This means, that on the main sensor, the sun will only be a small circle with less than 1/100th of the image diagonal. If you are lucky and own a mobile phone with optical tele (zoom) with 10x or more and a 50 megapixel sensor, the sun will show up with some / reasonable size on your photo. Still, it will not compare to decent tele photo lenses or telescopes simply due to optical limits of the tiny lenses in the mobile phone cameras. The key reason is called diffraction (waves passing through an aperture will alter their direction by some extent), which limits optics from exceeding resolution depending on the aperture size of the lens. A large mobile phone camera lens with i.e. 10 mm diameter has a resolvin limit of approximately 12 arcseconds (1/300th degree). In comparison, a larger tele lens or smaller telescope with 72 mm lens diameter would be able to resolve 1.4 arcseconds.

To break it down, the following table has some technical information about the sizes of the sun on different cameras:

Mobile phone camera36mm equiv. Focal LengthDiagonal FOVAngular Resolution (50 MPx sensor)Size of sun
0.5x ultra-wide12 mm120°0.0118° / Px
42.33″ / Px
42 Px
1x main camera24 mm80°0.0078° / Px
28.22″ / Px
64 Px
10x tele240 mm10°0.0010° / Px
3.53″ / Px
510 Px
Size of the sun on mobile phone camera with 50 megapixel sensor

Probably easier to see are the real world examples… I took these images using the mandatory solar filters ahead of the 2024 eclipse. I wantet to see, how much of the corona would fit in and how precise the tracking has to be for the required shots.

This demonstrates, that on the mobile phone, the sun is only a tiny dot. Even the tele camera is not showing details due to the optical limits. To photograph the sun with some details of the surface, a larger optic is required. But what a telescope or a large tele lens is not capable of to record is the whole scenery and the emotional impact of a solar eclipse. This would be the perfect use of the mobile phone.

Final word: No matter what you want to capture during a total solar eclipse – prepare everything to run as independent as possible. The few minutes of totality are best recorded in your own memory. Do not let the technical gizmos distract you from this uniqe moment!

Active sun – quiet sun

The sun follows a regular cycle of activity and quietnes. This cycle takes 11 years to start over again. By chance, the 2017 total solar eclipse was at the solar minimum and the 2024 total solar eclipse was at the most active phase – the solar maximum. Comparing the images I took during totality of the two eclipses, the solar corona also reflects this.

During the solar minimum, the corona looks more structured. At the poles, the corona shows a well defined pattern resembling the magnetic field lines.

In contrary, during the solar maximum, there are more jets and streamers (also at the poles) but there are less structured patterns. Especially the inner corona looks rather chaotic compared to the quiet sun.

It will be fascinating to compare these images with further images from other eclipses…

Total Solar Eclipse USA 2024-04-08

The main reason to travel to the US and go on a road trip to follow almost the entire golf coast from east to west was to see and photograph the total solar eclipse on April, 8th.
My plan was to image with a total of 9 cameras. Most of the cameras got a custom made (see my 3D design here: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2431974) flip-away solar filter, to facilitate the on and off during totality. As I was up to share my photos with the scientific community through the Eclipse Mega Movie project, like in 2017 (https://eclipsemegamovie.org/), I had some constraints to follow for my setup.

Therefore, the complete setup, which should be mounted on 4 independent tracking mounts, was:

  • Sony A6000 full-specturm modified with 80/600mm APO
  • Sony A6400 with 72/435mm APO for longer exposure sequences
  • Sony A6400 with 72/435mm APO for shorter exposure sequences
  • Sony A99ii with 35mm lens to capture the eclipsed sun with planets and hopefully a comet
  • Sony A58 with 135mm lens
  • Sony ZV-E10 with 100/1000mm maksutov
  • QHY485C with 50/242mm APO for a totality video
  • 2 GoPro cameras for scenery
Test setup with almost all cameras

With bad luck, the airline was incapable of delivering one piece of luggage with my primary tracking mount within almost 3 weeks. Therefore I had to reduce the actual setup for the eclipse day in parts. Furthermore, it was quite unsure, whether observing the eclipse was even possible. A wide stretched cloud system covered large protions of Texas. In the morning, there was not even a patch of blue sky visible. Luckily, the clouds got less and less and even the one cloud covering the sun a few minutes before totality moved away. So we finlly could observe the eclipsed sun with an almost perfect sky. In the end I was able to record the required images, totaling to more than 400 GB of data.

Total solar eclipse 2017 timelapses from Riverton, Wyoming

After working through all the data collected from the solar eclipse in August, I combined the wide angle images (8mm lens) and the images captured through my 600mm travel telescope to timelapses. The wide-angle video is the result of more than 800 single exposures, covering the day from around 6am till 5pm. The most interresting part around totality is significantly slowed down, as totality would be over in a blink. During partial phase, I was so busy trying to fix my automated triggering system, that I did not realize the clouds until post processing. So it was really pleasing to see all the clouds above my site vanish moments before totality began. On the other hand, the remaining clouds increased the view of the shadow of the moon passing over, which is just amazing!
The inlay in the wide angle video is derived from the high res video.

I am really pleased with the results, but check for yourself!

Total solar eclipse 2017 from Riverton, Wyoming

All the effort to travel around the world for just a few images…  Well, it was really a challenge to carry the 60+kg equippment to Riverton, Wyoming. It was even more challenging to try to last-minute fix an error in my computer controlled camera trigger system. And last but not least, 2 cameras stopped capturing during totality… It would have been a total disappointment, if…

… if my best camera / lens combination I had set up wouldn’t have done the following 🙂
See for yourself, why I am absolutely happy:

Total Solar Eclipse in Turkey 2026-03-29

It has been a bit more than 6 years since I could see the total solar eclipse in Austria (11th August 1999), when I found an advert for an eclipse trip to Turkey for March 2006. The amateur astronomers from Viennese Astro-Station-Conrad organized this tour, where more than 300 enthusiasts and eclipsophiles participated and travelled to a hotel near Side. The holiday resort at the mediterranean sea was perfectly placed in the path of totality.

Since I first saw prominences through a telescope with hydrogen (H-alpha) filter, and results from the 1999 eclipse were mediocre (I only had a tripod and manual trigger), my dream was to capture prominences during the eclipse. For good results, a tracking mount is required. I onyl had a shaky EQ2 mount, which is built for telescopes with up to 4 kg. My initial plan was to use 2 cameras. Though I could further borrow a third camera as well as another mirror lens.

But how to mount these three cameras? I could not find a base supporting 3 cameras – especially none suitable to attach to the EQ2. I came up with an aluminium frame and pipe clamps from the hardware store. The contraption is definitely unconventional. The total weight put on the EQ2 is also way above the specified limits. Luckily, there were no major issues. Only the little motor struggled from time to time to keep the gear coupling.

The setup:

  • Minolta Dynax 7, Sigma 135-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG APO @ 400mm
  • Konica-Minolta Dynax 7d, MC MTO 11CA (1000mm mirror lens)
  • Canon 20d, MC MTO 11CA

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use the site (including navigation and scrolling), you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close